At Burnt Edges, when we consult with a client we use the same time line, regardless of talent level, to define the parameters of their putting stroke. We start with a determination of the posture and distance from the ball where they perceive the target most accurately. Second, we want to know where they play the ball; relative to their stance forward or back, that provides the best visual to aim the putter. If that seems redundant, I understand why you might think that way, but for the sake of today's discussion think of it in terms direct vision (aim) and peripheral vision (target awareness). We then want to understand how these visual decisions, along with body type, influence alignment. Most assume you must be parallel; but historically we have seen great putters open, closed and parallel. We know from interviews this was primarily based on where they "see it" best. So rather than assume there is a best way, why not make every possibility available to us. Based on these findings, we then want to discover how they start and finish the physical movement in their putting stroke. In Burnt Edges terminology, source, sequence and finish. When you add these parameters together and deal with any movement conflicts the system identifies, we find the “defined” putting stroke has a greater than 95% probability to be diagrammed by one of the Nine Profiles to within one standard statistical deviation. CLICK HERE TO SEE THE 9 PROFILES. Armed with this information the task is to find the putter that has the most positive influence on that stroke.
Today’s discussion involves a solution that many tour level players have found for the following definition. A stroke with a small to moderate arc plane, (shown above), parallel to the target line, where the stroke is finished with the trail hand. “A little hit at the bottom” would be the old school phrase to describe it. This “hit” comes in two forms. First would be players who have a small hinge of the trail wrist that releases the wrist hinge at impact. The second and more common, where they release the toe, and the majority of the required forward swing rotation happens at impact. For today’s example we are looking at helping a rotational hit.
Controlling trail hand rotation at impact might be the most common issue we see. The problem comes from using this movement pattern with the putter moving on a arc parallel and matching the target line at impact. In simple terms, the rotational hit closes the face too much and you get a pull miss. At this point you are probably thinking you might try to eliminate the “hit”. A good idea, except for many players the “hit” or rotation at impact is a critical factor in having a feel for speed. Ask Tiger Woods; it is an ingrained movement. As we discussed last time, one solution is to tilt the arc plane away from the rotation. But that will not work if all the other parameters lead you to a parallel Profile to target line.
|Arc Plane parallel to target line - face closed at impact.|
Fortunately, we found a solution in the latest design trend. Mallets with toe hang. The cog of the putter is deep enough in the head to slow rotation at impact, but still allow the feel of a hit at the bottom of the stroke. All the while, having enough feel of the toe of the putter, to allow for the necessary rotation to keep the putter on plane. The best part of the trend is that the OEM’s have put the short slant neck they used to create this model on various sizes and types of mallets. Below I have three examples of putters designed by Odyssey / Toulon that we have used with great success. Basic rule of thumb. The shorter and more aggressive your stroke, the farther you want the center of gravity from the face.
|From left to right Odyssey OWorks #7SRed - Toulon Atlanta H4 - Odyssey OWorks Two-Ball Fang S|
Deep - Deeper - Deepest
All of this to say, if you try to release the putter and miss left, try a mallet with toe hang. As always, if you feel that you fit this scenario and have some questions feel free to contact me at my Burnt Edges email address.